Broadcastthis’s Weblog


What happened to Canada?
March 12, 2009, 11:41 pm
Filed under: disinfo reporting | Tags: , , , ,

What happened to Canada?
Norman Finkelstein questions our nation’s acceptance of Israeli policies
by Jason Chesworth
March 03, 2009
Originally published at Scene and Heard.ca

finkelstein

The Government of Israel flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the Jordan river. The Palestinians can run their lives freely in the framework of self-rule, but not as an independent and sovereign state. Thus, for example, in matters of foreign affairs, security, immigration and ecology, their activity shall be limited in accordance with imperatives of Israel’s existence, security and national needs.
– Likud Party Platform “Peace & Security”

Towards the end of his 60-plus minute address on Israel’s invasion of Gaza, at U of T on January 15th, former Harvard professor Dr. Norman Finkelstein, made a simple comment that received a surprisingly supportive round of applause from the largely Canadian audience.

“I don’t know what has happened to Canada”, Dr. Finklestein stated plainly. “I was here 25 years ago and met a Palestinian man who had refugee status and was living in Montreal. I asked him how he found it, living in Canada, and he said, ‘to live as a refugee is always difficult, but if I had to live anywhere in the world, Canada would be my first choice. In Canada, you can experience the country the same way as Canadians do.’”

In the 25 years that have since passed, Norman Finkelstein simply can’t account for why our outlook on international affairs and foreign policies have shifted away from keeping the peace and moved towards engagement.

Surely, the supportive applause was largely due to the fact the audience was filled with Palestinians, activists and students, but to those of us sitting on the sidelines without an ethnic, religious or familial tie to the conflict; the applause appeared to come out of an appreciation for Dr. Finkelstein’s courage to continue a discussion that is nearly impossible to have in an era that is steeped in hope for change and progress.

Finkelstein, the son of Holocaust survivors, has long been demonized for his criticism of Israel’s aggressive policies towards the Palestinian people, regardless of the political representation of Palestine (PLO, Fatah, Hamas). A frequent lecturer, contributor to various news outlets, Dr. Finkelstein regularly chronicles the asymmetric, disproportionate and increasingly illegal warfare tactics employed by the Israeli Defense Forces against the Palestinian civilian population.

But what of Dr. Finkelstein’s question: “What has happened to Canada”? The irony of an American asking a Canadian audience this question notwithstanding, it seems a particularly important question to be asking at this time in our history if we are even flirting with the idea of asking the next and more pressing question: “What will happen to Canada?”

To take an educated guess, Canadians by and large, see themselves as peacekeeping, human rights defenders who err on the side of moderation and have a basic Foreign Policy to foster democratic principles throughout the world. In short, we’re good, peace-loving people. Except for the fact that the majority of us appear to have a deep “hate-on” for a Prime Minister who can’t seem to lose for winning; Canadians seem to view themselves as a “do-good” type of folk occasionally hamstrung by self-serving elected officials – not as de facto supporters of illegal wars or the use of illegal weapons.

Finkelstein was sure to point out that it wasn’t only Stephen Harper and the PMO’s way of thinking that he didn’t understand; but also that of our intellectual elite and general acquiescence to the notion that this conflict falls under the banner of “self-defense” for one party and not for the other. It was difficult to leave the lecture hall without considering the kind of pro forma support a citizenry gives its tenuous leadership in the form of silence.

Old adages used to subjugate discussion or debate, such as, “this war has been going on for a thousand years” are difficult to make sense of, knowing that the war being fought on the other side of the world was (as we left the lecture hall), happening in real time with real weapons, costing lives that were very much in the present day.

It was impossible not to consider that, the battles being fought throughout Gaza had illegal weapons (white phosphorous, Dense Inert Materials Explosives), being rained down upon a civilian population who had already been weakened financially, emotionally and left without adequate food and potable water by more than 18-months of strict sanctions already put in place by Israel. Food, water, electricity and money had already been in scarce supply within Gaza’s borders well before Israel unilaterally decided to end the six-month ceasefire.

And what will happen to Canada? Will we continue to support countries that aggressively expand their interests at the expense of an already decimated population?



What if…?
February 13, 2009, 8:06 pm
Filed under: disinfo reporting, economy, subprime credit crisis

Ron Paul does it again. He was kept out of debates while campaigning for the Republican leadership and he’s kept far from the 24-hour news cycles that keep terror and tragedy in high rotation. But he keeps speaking truth to power and I hope he keeps doing it for as long as he can.



Oh… and Happy New Year…
January 4, 2009, 9:04 pm
Filed under: tv | Tags: , , ,

Is it any wonder that the unlucky soldiers who return home from Afghanistan in caskets do so under the cover of night with no media coverage?

Perhaps I’m just an overly-sensitive type of person, but if I saw regular footage of the effects of war (as opposed to the constant trumping of the “causes”), I may just decide to say “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore”.

Just the other day, I was remarking to a friend that, despite the Israeli invasion of Gaza, the television schedule was filled with retrospectives of celebrity gaffes and fashions (read: old stories about pretty people).

Note to self: be careful what you wish for.

For what it’s worth – I’m very thankful for all of my friends and family. Coming right off of the holiday season, (the time of year that we take time to appreciate each other), I find myself more thankful than ever to find myself in good company. I’m willing to bet that we all hold these things dear.

My heart goes out to those with loved ones heading into any “theater of war” in 2009.

Apologies in advance for the video below. Looking away seems worse than not acknowledging that this is happening right now. Even more frightening is the thought that this is happening in many, many places.

Warning: this video is graphic and shows the immediate after effect of the bombing of a market in Gaza.

Posted to Muslim TV by mounir1426 on January 03, 2009



Best evidence that Obama was pre-selected
November 5, 2008, 2:08 am
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , ,

Came home to find the week’s issue of “The Economist” on the doorstep…

c7a0a42ea72d4ce57a39ab069277d004_2

And I thought to myself…

Y’know… it’s election day. Obama hasn’t even been elected democratically by the voting public, and a major newsmagazine, The Economist, is telling us that *It’s time* over a picture of a very stately Barak Obama. I’m gonna go out on a limb here and *suppose* that the editorial board of The Economist feels pretty certain that Obama’s gonna be POTUS, otherwise they’re sending out a *very* mixed signal. It’s like they already knew, (whenever this issue rolled off the presses… I mean… how many days ago was this thing printed in order to hit my doorstep *today*?! Election day!) It’s like the editorial board just felt that all of the research data at their disposal and gut instincts told them that Obama is *the man* and they’re just cutting to the chase and assuming that it’s a done deal.

Otherwise…

dewey-defeats-truman1

I’ll say it with a heavy heart…

Obama is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. I *Hope* I’m wrong.



Hope, Change…and more of the same…

As I’ve written previously, I generally ignore election campaigns and prefer instead to pay attention to politics *between* elections. The problem with U.S. politics is that they’re *always* campaigning. I’ve been calling an Obama win for over a year now, and of course I’m still convinced (though I still have the strong taste of crow in my mouth since calling an Obama/Gore ticket so vehemently for so long ;-) . I’ve always held the belief that the U.S. (s)election would always be made out to look like a close race even though popular sentiment would decisively back Obama as President.

I’ll still be blogging away while the world tucks itself in for a nice long 4-year slumber with visions of *Hope* & *Change* dancing in their heads.

Sarah Palin will fade from your memory quicker than a season of Survivor….

Seriously folks… I write because I care. I maintain this blog because I actually *give a shit* and if you’ve read this far, I already think you’re an awfully swell person and just want you to know that Sarah Palin is bad for you. This is an intervention. If you’ve thought about her in the last 24 hours, I’m ordering you to pick up a glass of something with alcohol in it, pick up a bong, download some porn and forget about her. It’ll be easier than quitting smoking. She will never become the President of the United States of America. If you’ve ever spent any of your precious time even *fantasizing* about such a thing happening you need to turn your thoughts to sex *right now*… and not about sex with Sarah Palin, that’s cheating… she *is* hot but she’s not *that* hot. Tina Fey is the obvious second choice, but *even then* you can’t think about having sex with Tina Fey *as* Sarah Palin… that’s cheating too… you need to stop thinking about this woman altogether… it’s a moot point.

Cheney’s the dude that needs to be kept under constant scrutiny… not Sarah freakin’ Palin. She’s not getting the financial backing that’s kept Cheney in the White House off and on for the past 3 decades, nor is she getting the kind of support that Obama’s getting. She’s a “red herring”.

Hope is not a plan…

rolling_stone_obama

If we’re truly *Hoping* for a *Change* we need to keep asking the question: where does Obama get all of his money from? Consider this… “campaign contributions” and “fundraising” are terms that are used to describe personal private money given to a Candidate during a “campaign”. This affords a person running for the *office* of the President of the United States of America the opportunity to say to the “establishment” – “this is how much money I can get people to give me”. Not  *only* is this money from the “plain folk” – it’s also *huge* cash raised from within the establishment itself!! In other words… the *same* people that made George W. Bush the most highly financed campaigner in U.S. history… the same people that put their money where there mouths are for Bush policies have decided that they like Obama’s take on the world *so much* – they’re making Obama the most highly financed campaigner in U.S. history!! I wonder… did the establishment just change their minds *completely*? And just how does President Obama go about paying his debts to his financiers?

There’s so much freakin’ history happening out there right now I can’t understand how people can sit through a full interview with Sarah Palin. She’s says *nothing* while Cheney travels to Georgia to deal with the Russian war. She says nothing of any consequence while Hank Paulson (former CEO of Goldman Sachs…Goldamn Goldman Sachs is the #2 top contributor to Obama), *creates* the $700 billion line of credit for himself and future Secretaries of the Treasury. She’s not saying anything worth listening to while Obama prepares his incoming Cabinet to keep flooding the world with American dollars (thereby continuing the crash of the economy) and continue further wars in the Middle East (Pakistan, Afghanistan).

5 Questions I have for an Obama Administration:

  1. Will the Patriot Act be repealed?
  2. Will the Glass Steagall Act (or something like it) be brought back from the dead?
  3. Will American troops be brought home, or will they just be redeployed to a neighbouring country?
  4. Will Obama (a Constitutional lawyer) re-write and *restore* the Constitutional right that Americans have to *not* be spied on by their government? How’s about the right to due process? Will he bring that back? Habeus Corpus? Posse Comitatus?
  5. Will the *Change* that we *Need* look anything like the *Change* that we *Hope* for?

The great Orator…

For the life of me, I just can’t get as excited as everyone else when Obama speaks. You know… he’s a politician. To get to this point (most highly financed campaign in history, right after W.), Obama had to serve the same masters as every President before him. Folks… you don’t get there (POTUS) without assuring the “money” that you’ll do what needs to get done. Please don’t fall asleep at the wheel for the next four years. Don’t believe the big toothy soothing grin in a year from now when President Obama explains why Pakistan needs to be “dealt with” or why it’s not his fault that his version of a $700 billion line-of-credit needs to be added to the inflationary U.S. money supply.

Instead… keep going back to the words of the greatest American orator. Martin Luther King Jr. King was *not* a politician. He was a true leader. He wasn’t *Hope* for *Change*. He *was* change.

We don’t need another President. We *Need* *Progress* that can *Change* the way that we *Hope*



The strategy of losing… (and other clusterf***s)

Thank God *that’s* over…

Although I’m always up for the opportunity to have a “changing of the guard”, I’m relieved that the Canadian election is over. I prefer to pay attention to politics between elections. Seems like more things actually happen during this period. Just as some can’t understand my penchant for reading about politicians and policy on a daily basis, I can’t understand how people can get whipped into such a lather in such a short period of time – and yet, can’t sustain their interest in the issues outside of an election campaign.

And really… how many “issues” are actually debated throughout the course of the campaign?

How many of us could actually *explain* Dion’s Green Shift? (I’m not judging, I couldn’t do it…and if it weren’t for trying to stay focused… I’d make an argument right now that Dion himself can’t explain it)

How many pissed off artists could have actually named an Heritage Ministry program that was going to be affected by the $45-million cut to “The Arts” (which were announced a *year ago*) before they updated their Facebook statuses to quip their distaste for Harper’s “gala” comment. How many of these self-same artists could identify which of the programs to be on the chopping block were of Conservative origin, or carry-overs from previous Liberal administration attempts to hack away at their industry? I mean, if we’re going to get *strategic* with our voting (which, correct me if I’m wrong, implies a certain amount of thought going into the process of determining a “strategic” vote) – if we’re going to get *strategic*…

Shouldn’t there be a plan?

Call me “Crazy”, but… I’m reminded of the quote, “The best laid schemes of mice and men/ Go oft awry”.  So… what if there are *no* plans being laid? What if we’re just pulling strategies out of our a**? I think we can safely assume that, if the “best laid” plans often end up in a clusterf***, you can be s*** sure that *no plans* will end up in the Mother of all clusterf***s.

The Mother of All Clusterf***s?!

YES! The Mother of All Clusterf***s. That being… another Harper Administration.

That being… *exactly* the opposite of A B C. Anything *But* Conservative?! Sorry… how about… Always Be Conservative. Anything But Change. Always Believe CNN. (I digress…)

There may be an argument in support of strategic voting, but it’s wrong. At the very least… it’s not “right”. It doesn’t work, as evidenced by the outcome of this most recent Canadian election. At this point, a thousand “if only such-and-such had occurred” arguments will not trump the “Harper *is* Prime Minister” theory. All apologies… (truly… he’s fast-tracking us to the North American Union folks…)

So Where Does This Leave Us?

I sincerely hope that all of the piss-and-vinegar that each Canadian citizen seemed to be willing to put on display in the form of a Facebook status, lawn sign, bumper sticker or TV show choice, doesn’t completely subside with the next four years of “the Devil you know” putting everyone to sleep with visions of Sugarplums and Jack Layton Dancing With The Stars in their heads.

This is my New Year’s Eve.

Elections are my X-mas season and I don’t dig X-mas. But it *is* a time of renewal and *that* I can dig.

My New Year’s resolutions are to:

  1. Remember that my union (ACTRA) supports Harper’s Bill C-61 (Canadian Copyright Act). At least… they support it enough to get it passed, and *then* argue for the changes that they want made… (trust me… more to come on *that* strategy…)
  2. Keep watching the economy slide towards a unified currency with the United States and Mexico as we all pretend that “no-one could have predicted this economic downturn”.
  3. Be thankful that I’m getting a little “long in the tooth” for draft age as we escalate our global conflicts and send more innocent and impressionable well-meaning youth off to fight bullshit wars for policies we’re not even able to effectively vote against.
  4. Not accept President Biden’s reasons for war against Iran/Afghanistan/Pakistan/Venezuela.
  5. Learn to play the saxophone.

I know for a fact that I’m gonna bail on at least *one* of those resolutions before the next election.

I’ll say it again…

We’re doomed. But at least we’ll have YouTube… and really… that’s not all *that* bad!



It *can’t* happen in Canada… can it?

Yeah… it can…

I’m not a sophisticated investor and I certainly don’t fancy myself to be a financial analyst, but… here’s my arguement for the “economic crisis” in the U.S. washing up on Canadian shores despite Harper and Flaherty’s best attempts to say that “we’re safe”.

  1. Take a peek at the performance of the TSX yesterday… a record all-time loss… the TSX is a Canadian stock exchange that’s heavy on commodities… yeah, that’s right… all of those natural resources that make “the fundamentals of our economy” strong (so they say…) The U.S. Congress acts… Canada reacts immediately…
  2. If the American taxpayer is essentially “out of money” (meaning: credit)… how’re they gonna buy the stuff that we sell? If our #1 consumer can no longer tap into the equity of their homes (if they’re lucky enough to still have one), how can we expect them to keep on buying shit they don’t need with money they don’t have?
  3. There’s a bit of truth to the idea that Canadian banks won’t get hit as hard as banks in the U.S., but don’t think for a moment that we won’t get hit at all. Sure, they have more banks (more small, “Mom & Pop” types of banks)… but the banks that have been “going down” are large banks. Really big banks. Meaning – Canadian banks are tied up financially with them. It’s inevitable. If you were really able to see what your pension/RRSP etc. was invested in, you’d probably start to understand quickly just how inextricably linked we all are to the U.S. economy.
  4. Global markets and economies are being hit big time by all of this action in the U.S. Ireland has just gone into recession. The U.K. is nationalizing their banks quicker than the U.S.  Iceland is nationalizing too! Markets in Asia are collapsing… how can Canada *not* be affected?

All things considered…

On paper, it’s a good thing that the $700-billion “bail-out” package didn’t pass through Congress. Why? Because it’s an act of Socialism in a Capitalist economy.  But…

It ain’t over ’til it’s over…

This is the exact same Bush Administration that brought you an illegal and widely unpopular war. The same people that lie about *everything* and do whatever they please.

I’ll make a bet with you right now…

The U.S. economy will get some form of bailout that looks an awful lot like this massive bailout. Bush will address the Nation/World this morning and lie to us again and somehow his people will pull-off the incredible looting of the U.S. taxpayer… somehow… they’ve got “gumption”, y’know…

What you need to know about a “bail-out”…

Two things:

  1. A bail-out does *not* help the tax-payer. It puts them in the very position that the banks want out of. A “bail-out” should be seen as “bailing” on the U.S. citizen. Don’t confuse this with “assistance”.
  2. The government/banks want the U.S. taxpayer to buy up toxic debt. They want the tax-payer to buy shit that no-one, and I mean *no-one* in the financial world wants to touch with a ten-foot pole… does this make sense to you?

“Hey… this shit is toxic and worthless… you should buy it…”



I *heart* Heart
September 23, 2008, 11:32 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized



I need $1,000 billion quick… know where I can find it?
September 22, 2008, 12:49 pm
Filed under: Uncategorized

*Let me begin by saying…*

I can’t fully explain why I’m up on a Sunday night reading the details of the U.S. Treasury plan to bailout the economy… so let’s just call it a “compulsion” to understand why the f*** I wake up every morning to earn an hourly wage…

I think it’s safe to say that, while the “work” week begins on Monday; the “business” week actually starts on Sunday. That’s why senior members of the Bush Administration go on Meet The Press or This Week so early in the morning on a weekend… supposedly the “day of rest”… (I mean, if you’re a Christian it’s a day of rest…)

You know it’s gonna be an interesting week when the Treasury Secretary hits *both* ABC and NBC on the same day

…and says, “I’m not going to bet against the American people”.  Which, to a savvy investor, means that you *should* bet against the American people, because the Bush Administration’s track record of “getting it right” is so painfully and obviously not good.

If you take the advice given by a senior member of the Bush Administration, it can only mean one thing: you’re retarded. (And yes, by that I mean the bad, politically incorrect, offensive kind of “retarded”.)

But… hasn’t it always been like this? Markets go up, markets go down…

No… actually… it’s never been like this before. That’s why the word “unprecedented” keeps showing up in the coverage of the $1+ trillion bailouts that the American taxpayer has been providing without so much as a vote!

Understand this: the American taxpayer (read: the consumer that keeps your economy afloat) has just added more than $1 trillion to their line of credit. Problem is… it’s their inability to pay off their debts (meaning: lines of credit) that has gotten us into this situation in the first place.

How much is $1 trillion?

$1,000,000,000,000 or $1,000 billion.

Yes, that’s right… the U.S. government was able to come up with >$1,000 billion in a little more than a week to bail out Wall St. If you don’t find this to be absolutely stunning news, I submit to you that you’re a) apathetic to a point that would actually have kept your from reading this blog in the first place or, b) completely unaware of your financial environment.

If you answered, “b”…

Then you’re in the majority. Don’t sweat it. You’re just like everyone else. You may however, want to consider the following…

Supposedly we live in a system of free-market capitalism. This is the system from which our cash flow is derived. The money that ends up in your pocket and/or your bank account (to be applied to your various bills and other obligations) is supposedly the product of “capitalism at work”. You may or may not agree with the system, but *supposedly*, it’s the system that we’re in… right?

But when you literally “bail-out” a financial institution and “nationalize” it…

It’s called “Socialism”… and, you may or may not agree with *that* system… but it’s the antithesis of the system that we’re all thinking we’re working with!!

Socialism for the rich, Capitalism for the poor…



God’s plan for gas prices

“I believe that there’s a plan for this world” - Sarah Palin

Now, you know…

…if *I* said that *I* believed that there was “a plan for this world”, y’all’d think I was crazy and assume that I was talking about some kinda New World Order bullshit, right?… right??

Well, I’m not gonna to talk about any Novus Ordo Seclorum bullshit…

I’m gonna talk about bank bailouts and why “day” is now “night”…

Oh, we got trouble, right here in River City. And that starts with “T” and that rhymes with “B” and that stands for “bailout”. Bank bailouts. Meaning: banks are getting bailed out by the government. The government only has one *real* source of cash… and that source is… you.

And by “you” I mean…

YOU! The tax-payer. HOLD ON! I just wrote the word “tax-payer” and I could feel you itching to click your mouse, but hear me out…

I’m specifically referring to the American tax-payer, (you know, the one that buys everything that makes the economy turn ’round?). The American tax-payer is so incredibly indebted to the rest of the world in purely financial terms, there’s really no mathematical way around the fact that North Americans spend more than they make.  You don’t need to understand the intricacies of the “subprime credit crisis” to understand that, statistically speaking, we’re all in a heap o’ shit.

If you work any amount of time in your day in order to pay off debt, you may want to put down the remote and think about “your” cash for a moment…

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Lehman Bros., Bear Stearns… those are just the big names… these are the banks that are getting direct government intervention with money that you have to sign on the dotted line for agreeing to “cover” or “pay” (in the form of tax), every April. You are your government’s “guarantee” to its “creditors” (i.e. – China) that your country can pay off its debt. With this in mind… how’s your job going? Are you getting ahead or falling behind?

“So What? I’m not American! HA!”

Yes, you are. At least… your bank account is. And at the end of the day… that’s *you*, Baby… that’s your own personal treasure chest and the *only* thing that really matters to the bean-counters in the Treasury Department. You buy stuff, you borrow to get it, you need it, you want it… they know that…(and by “they”, I mean Hank Paulson, Darth Cheney, Ben Bernanke and a host of other people you’ll never remember the names of). We’re all inextricably financially linked to the U.S. Dollar, and I’m gonna presume that if you’ve read this far, you’re willing to at least entertain the idea that my arguement may have a bit of substance to it.

Back to the plan…

Sarah Palin firmly believes that there’s a “plan” for the world and that it’s “God’s plan”. Of course, her critics (including me), roll their collective eyes at the Christian Republican Fundamentalist world view, but what if there really *was* a plan? What if she was *right* about there being a plan, but was wrong about “what” or “who” was doing the planning? Before you start looking at the picture of The Great Seal on the American Dollar bill that sits above these words and start thinking that I’m going off on a “9/11 Truth” tantrum…

Have you seen a gas pump today?!… Have you?!…

I can’t say that I know of any plan specifically (if I did, I’d be sitting in a boardroom, not blogging), *but* it does occur to me that when you have the price of oil dropping significantly, and the price of gas *rising* significantly, you have at least *one* plan in place that is of great benefit to those making money on the whole deal.

To be sure, the current price spike is being attributed to Hurricane “Certain Death” Ike, (Category 2), and the havoc that we’re all *assuming* it’s going to wreak on oil production in the Gulf of Mexico. Now… I don’t know how much of our gas is refined from Gulf of Mexico oil, but considering the fact that we’re (Canada) a net *producer* of oil (and the U.S. is a net *importer* of oil), I’m still unclear as to how gasoline gets to this crazy price in this free-market capitalist society….

Wait a second…

Maybe the “plan” isn’t really “capitalist” or “free-market” at all… maybe (as evidenced by the nationalization of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac), just maybe… we’re living in a perverted scheme of “socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor”. The bank CEO’s fuck up; taxpayers pay up. Call *that* a conspiracy theory…

A strong dollar??

We’ve been living in this mental bubble in Canada that we have a “strong dollar”. Even with the CA$ currently around $0.92 against the US$, we Canadians still believe that we have a dollar that is strong… I’m putting the question out there… “how can it be *strong* when it’s being measured against a volatile and weakening currency”?

How can your dollar be *strong* when it purchases less and less and less every day??

How can a dollar be considered *strong* when – overnight – you need *more* of them to buy the exact same stuff that you bought only yesterday??

Like I said… I don’t *know* what the “plan” is exactly… but I’m not gonna bother pretending that Sarah Palin actually has her “finger on the pulse”.